MAKING SENSE OF THE ETHNIC PROFILING DEBATE
Margareth Etienne, January 2012
Summary
The debate over racial profiling, while appearing to have been settled at the close of the twentieth century, has been very much rekindled. Before the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, racial profiling was widely condemned in the United States. Public sentiment was decidedly against the practice, with up to 80% of Americans polled finding it unfair. Remaining consistent with popular sentiment, American politicians supported this view and spoke out against the practice. President Bill Clinton described racial profiling as ―morally indefensible,‖ while Al Gore and George W. Bush both campaigned for the Presidency arguing that racial profiling should be abandoned.
Keywords
Racial Profiling Terrorism
Preview
Metadata
Related publications
Prioritising the Rights and Well-being of Police Officers in Kenya
Policing in Kenya transcends mere employment; it's a profound calling characterised by danger and sacrifice. Officers endure disrupted …
RE-INTEGRATION OF EX-AL SHABAAB TERRORISTS INTO THE KENYAN SOCIETY: A CASE OF…
This study examines political factors, religious factors and social economic factors that have contributed a lot to the …
Assessing the Expeditiousness of Existing Strategies for Preventi…
Youth radicalization is a security problem in Kenya. Youth extremism has caused death, injury, psychological anguish, and increased …
PREVENTING YOUTH VIOLENT RADICALISATIONANDVIOLENT EXTREMISM IN KENYA: A PUBLIC …
Violent extremism and radicalization are multifaceted phenomena that advocates and promotes violence related with or justified by specific …