An explosive cocktail Counter-terrorism, militarisation and authoritarianism in the Philippines
Aries A Arugay, Marc Batac, Jordan Stree, June 2021
Summary
Violent groups committing terror attacks have existed in the Philippines since the early 1990s, often posing security threats to the state and the population. Today, it seems that President Rodrigo Duterte’s administration is taking advantage of their existence to justify a counterterrorism agenda which is used to legitimise an ongoing brutal crackdown on segments of opposition groups, political movements, civil society, human rights defenders, and Indigenous and minority populations. Our paper maps how the renewed global drive to counter terrorism, combined with the election of a populist government in the Philippines with autocratic instincts and violent tendencies, has produced an explosive cocktail; one that is having damaging effects on conflict dynamics, civic space and the democratic freedoms of Filipino citizens
Keywords
CVE, state brutality, populism, terror attacks, human rights, democracy, Phillipines, freedom
Preview
Metadata
Related publications
Enhance approaches to address the evolving nature of Violent Extremist Attacks …
According to the Centre for Human Rights and Policy Studies (CHRIPS) observatory report, the majority of attacks in …
Trends of Violent Extremist Attacks and Arrests in Kenya, January - December 20…
This report draws from the Terror Attacks and Arrests Observatory of the Centre for Human Rights and Policy …
The psychologisation of counterextremism: unpacking PREVENT
: The burgeoning ‘pre-crime’ industry reveals a deep overlap between national security and mental health. The UK’s counter-radicalisation …
Managing role expectations and emotions in encounters with extremism: Norwegian…
To prevent radicalisation and violent extremism, many European countries have adopted a multiagency approach, consisting of both police, …