Our responsibility to respect the rights of others: legality and humanity
Colin Harvey, June 2017
Summary
States tend to be concerned about self-definition, and immigration law arose as one attempt to mark out territory by establishing a regulatory system which defined who could enter, remain and be removed (with nationality and citizenship laws addressing membership). The risk with migration law, however, is the governmental temptation to nurture a continuing form of communal insecurity by constructing ‘ others’ as a threat. Governments have given into this urge all too often, and the application of migration law often says as much about national communities as it does about those seeking to enter or remain
Keywords
Immigration Legality Humanity
Preview
Metadata
Related publications
Enhance approaches to address the evolving nature of Violent Extremist Attacks …
According to the Centre for Human Rights and Policy Studies (CHRIPS) observatory report, the majority of attacks in …
Trends of Violent Extremist Attacks and Arrests in Kenya, January - December 20…
This report draws from the Terror Attacks and Arrests Observatory of the Centre for Human Rights and Policy …
Managing role expectations and emotions in encounters with extremism: Norwegian…
To prevent radicalisation and violent extremism, many European countries have adopted a multiagency approach, consisting of both police, …
The psychologisation of counterextremism: unpacking PREVENT
: The burgeoning ‘pre-crime’ industry reveals a deep overlap between national security and mental health. The UK’s counter-radicalisation …