Dealing with Radicalization in IDP Camps
Lawrence Kuznar, Ali Jafri, Eric Kuznar, February 2020
Summary
The Middle Eastern region of the USCENTCOM area of responsibility (AOR) currently has approximately 20million displaced persons, many of whom live in camps (see NSI Reach back question B3 response). These people have been uprooted, lost their livelihoods, and in many cases experienced severe trauma. These stresses place them at risk of radicalization as their frustrations and grievances increase with time. Research was conducted on counter-radicalization and deradicalization programs appropriate for use in refugee camps, returning a broad range of counter-radicalization measures, and screening and segregation protocols. Their validity, respective pros and cons, and implementation considerations are reported here. Determining the appropriate measures for protecting refugees, building community resilience, and triaging individuals who would most benefit from deradicalization programs can inform how USCENTCOM can take action, or support organizations that are engaged with deradicalization in refugee camps.
Keywords
IDP, Radicalisation, De-radicalisation, Disengagement, Counter-Radicalisation
Preview
Metadata
Related publications
Counterinsurgency, community participation, and the preventing and countering v…
Over the last six years, the P/CVE agenda has emphasized the need of preventative measures to augment kinetic …
What Drives Counter-Extremism? The Extent of P/CVE Policies in the West and The…
Counter-extremism (P/CVE) policies have shot to global prominence rapidly, yet there are large discrepancies in their implementation both …
Global Terrorism Index 2020
The GTI report is produced by the Institute for Economics & Peace (IEP) using data from the Global …
KENYA’S APPROACH IN COUNTERING VIOLENT EXTREMISM
This study examined Kenya‘s approach of Counter Violent Extremism (CVE) in achieving the intended objectives of preventing radicalization …