Muslim Profiles Post 9/11: Is Racial Profiling an Effective Counterterrorist Measure and Does It Violate the Right to Be Free from Discrimination?
Bernard E. Harcourt, March 2006
Summary
In the aftermath of the London bombings in July 2005, Paul Sperry of the Hoover Institution, a well respected public policy institute at Stanford University, defended the police profiling of young Muslim men in New York City subways as a matter of simple common sense. Writing in the pages of the New York Times, Sperry argued that any future terrorist offender is likely to be young, male, and Muslim: “Young Muslim men bombed the London tube, and young Muslim men attacked New York with planes in 2001. From everything we know about the terrorists who may be taking aim at our transportation system, they are most likely to be young Muslim men.”
Keywords
Counter-terrorism Racial Profiling
Preview
Metadata
Related publications
Prioritising the Rights and Well-being of Police Officers in Kenya
Policing in Kenya transcends mere employment; it's a profound calling characterised by danger and sacrifice. Officers endure disrupted …
RE-INTEGRATION OF EX-AL SHABAAB TERRORISTS INTO THE KENYAN SOCIETY: A CASE OF…
This study examines political factors, religious factors and social economic factors that have contributed a lot to the …
Assessing the Expeditiousness of Existing Strategies for Preventi…
Youth radicalization is a security problem in Kenya. Youth extremism has caused death, injury, psychological anguish, and increased …
PREVENTING YOUTH VIOLENT RADICALISATIONANDVIOLENT EXTREMISM IN KENYA: A PUBLIC …
Violent extremism and radicalization are multifaceted phenomena that advocates and promotes violence related with or justified by specific …