A Literature Review on Methodology used in Evaluating Effects of Preventive and De-radicalisation Interventions
Allard R. Feddes and Marcello Gallucci, January 2016
Summary
Policies aimed at preventing (further) radicalisation or aimed at de-radicalisation are required to be 'evidence-based'. This suggests that evaluators should apply rigorous empirical methodology and measurement techniques. However, it is often unclear what this evidence should consist of and how it should be gathered. In the present paper we present results of a literature review focusing on evaluations of programmes aimed at preventing radicalisation or de-radicalisation between 1990 until July 2014. We identified 55 manuscripts including 135 participant samples. Primary qualitative or quantitative empirical data about effectiveness of an intervention was presented in only 16 participant samples (12%).
Keywords
De-radicalization Terrorism
Preview
Metadata
Related publications
Prioritising the Rights and Well-being of Police Officers in Kenya
Policing in Kenya transcends mere employment; it's a profound calling characterised by danger and sacrifice. Officers endure disrupted …
RE-INTEGRATION OF EX-AL SHABAAB TERRORISTS INTO THE KENYAN SOCIETY: A CASE OF…
This study examines political factors, religious factors and social economic factors that have contributed a lot to the …
Assessing the Expeditiousness of Existing Strategies for Preventi…
Youth radicalization is a security problem in Kenya. Youth extremism has caused death, injury, psychological anguish, and increased …
PREVENTING YOUTH VIOLENT RADICALISATIONANDVIOLENT EXTREMISM IN KENYA: A PUBLIC …
Violent extremism and radicalization are multifaceted phenomena that advocates and promotes violence related with or justified by specific …