CVE Research Hub Knowledge Platform · Kenya
Human rights Article

The impossibility of global anti-terrorism law?

Victor V. Ramraj, June 2017

Summary

h e unfolding of legal developments around the world post-9/11 is a familiar story. In the days following the attacks, the US Congress and the Bush Administration sprang into action, laying the legal foundation for a decade long domestic and international response by the US government as part of a ‘global war on terrorism’. Declaring that the rest of the world was either ‘with us or with the terrorists’, the Bush Administration went to the UN Security Council and obtained a novel legal instrument, Resolution 1373, opening the door to a coordinated legislative response by states to international terrorism, and centralized monitoring of that response by the Counter-Terrorism Committee.

Keywords

Terrorism Counter Terrorism

Preview

Metadata

Theme
Human rights
Type
Article
Format
Adobe PDF
Published
12 June 2017
Author
Victor V. Ramraj
Access
Open access

Related publications

Enhance approaches to address the evolving nature of Violent Extremist Attacks …

According to the Centre for Human Rights and Policy Studies (CHRIPS) observatory report, the majority of attacks in …

Trends of Violent Extremist Attacks and Arrests in Kenya, January - December 20…

This report draws from the Terror Attacks and Arrests Observatory of the Centre for Human Rights and Policy …

Managing role expectations and emotions in encounters with extremism: Norwegian…

To prevent radicalisation and violent extremism, many European countries have adopted a multiagency approach, consisting of both police, …

The psychologisation of counterextremism: unpacking PREVENT

: The burgeoning ‘pre-crime’ industry reveals a deep overlap between national security and mental health. The UK’s counter-radicalisation …