The impossibility of global anti-terrorism law?
Victor V. Ramraj, June 2017
Summary
h e unfolding of legal developments around the world post-9/11 is a familiar story. In the days following the attacks, the US Congress and the Bush Administration sprang into action, laying the legal foundation for a decade long domestic and international response by the US government as part of a ‘global war on terrorism’. Declaring that the rest of the world was either ‘with us or with the terrorists’, the Bush Administration went to the UN Security Council and obtained a novel legal instrument, Resolution 1373, opening the door to a coordinated legislative response by states to international terrorism, and centralized monitoring of that response by the Counter-Terrorism Committee.
Keywords
Terrorism Counter Terrorism
Preview
Metadata
Related publications
Enhance approaches to address the evolving nature of Violent Extremist Attacks …
According to the Centre for Human Rights and Policy Studies (CHRIPS) observatory report, the majority of attacks in …
Trends of Violent Extremist Attacks and Arrests in Kenya, January - December 20…
This report draws from the Terror Attacks and Arrests Observatory of the Centre for Human Rights and Policy …
Managing role expectations and emotions in encounters with extremism: Norwegian…
To prevent radicalisation and violent extremism, many European countries have adopted a multiagency approach, consisting of both police, …
The psychologisation of counterextremism: unpacking PREVENT
: The burgeoning ‘pre-crime’ industry reveals a deep overlap between national security and mental health. The UK’s counter-radicalisation …