The criminal law and its less restrained alternatives
Kent Roach, June 2017
Summary
Many societies instinctively and quickly reach for the criminal law as a response to terrorism. Th e first part of this chapter will explore the many dangers of relying on new and re-enforced criminal laws as the main response to terrorism. In the aftermath of 9/11, UN Security Council Resolution 1373 (2001) encouraged nations to enact new laws against terrorism without offering any guidance about how terrorism should be defined. The result was extremely broad definitions of terrorism that attempt to respond to the many vulnerabilities of modern society, but also blur the boundaries between terrorism and illegal, but non-violent, forms of dissent.
Keywords
Terrorism Human Rights
Preview
Metadata
Related publications
Enhance approaches to address the evolving nature of Violent Extremist Attacks …
According to the Centre for Human Rights and Policy Studies (CHRIPS) observatory report, the majority of attacks in …
Trends of Violent Extremist Attacks and Arrests in Kenya, January - December 20…
This report draws from the Terror Attacks and Arrests Observatory of the Centre for Human Rights and Policy …
The psychologisation of counterextremism: unpacking PREVENT
: The burgeoning ‘pre-crime’ industry reveals a deep overlap between national security and mental health. The UK’s counter-radicalisation …
Managing role expectations and emotions in encounters with extremism: Norwegian…
To prevent radicalisation and violent extremism, many European countries have adopted a multiagency approach, consisting of both police, …