Legitimacy and Deterrence Effects in Counter-Terrorism Policing: A Study of Muslim Americans
Tom Tyler, Stephen Schulhofer and Stephen Schulhofer, February 2010
Summary
This study considers the circumstances under which members of the Muslim American community voluntarily cooperate with police efforts to combat terrorism. Cooperation is defined to include both a general receptivity toward helping the police in anti-terror work, and the specific willingness to alert police to terror related risks in a community. Two perspectives on why people cooperate with law enforcement, both developed with reference to general policing, are compared in the context of anti-terror policing and specifically among members of the Muslim American community. The first is instrumental. It suggests that people cooperate because they see tangible benefits that outweigh any costs. The second perspective is normative. It posits that people respond to their belief that police are a legitimate authority.
Keywords
Counter-Terrorism Policing Securitization
Preview
Metadata
Related publications
Prioritising the Rights and Well-being of Police Officers in Kenya
Policing in Kenya transcends mere employment; it's a profound calling characterised by danger and sacrifice. Officers endure disrupted …
RE-INTEGRATION OF EX-AL SHABAAB TERRORISTS INTO THE KENYAN SOCIETY: A CASE OF…
This study examines political factors, religious factors and social economic factors that have contributed a lot to the …
Assessing the Expeditiousness of Existing Strategies for Preventi…
Youth radicalization is a security problem in Kenya. Youth extremism has caused death, injury, psychological anguish, and increased …
PREVENTING YOUTH VIOLENT RADICALISATIONANDVIOLENT EXTREMISM IN KENYA: A PUBLIC …
Violent extremism and radicalization are multifaceted phenomena that advocates and promotes violence related with or justified by specific …