Transplantation
Laura K. Donohue, June 2017
Summary
In the first edition of this volume, I suggested that in liberal–democratic states, it is a spiral, not a pendulum, that best describes the evolution of counter-terrorist law. Introduced in the wake of the latest attack, new measures seek to expand executive authority. Legislators tend to capitulate to the executive’s demands, often under expedited circumstances and without careful analysis of how the attack occurred. The most onerous provisions may be subject to sunset clauses, but there after repeal becomes extremely dii cult. To allow such measures to lapse, legislators must demonstrate that the threat no longer exists, that by repealing the provisions violence will not ensue or that some level of violence is acceptable.
Keywords
Counter terrorism Transplantation Human Rights
Preview
Metadata
Related publications
Enhance approaches to address the evolving nature of Violent Extremist Attacks …
According to the Centre for Human Rights and Policy Studies (CHRIPS) observatory report, the majority of attacks in …
Trends of Violent Extremist Attacks and Arrests in Kenya, January - December 20…
This report draws from the Terror Attacks and Arrests Observatory of the Centre for Human Rights and Policy …
Managing role expectations and emotions in encounters with extremism: Norwegian…
To prevent radicalisation and violent extremism, many European countries have adopted a multiagency approach, consisting of both police, …
The psychologisation of counterextremism: unpacking PREVENT
: The burgeoning ‘pre-crime’ industry reveals a deep overlap between national security and mental health. The UK’s counter-radicalisation …