Legislating anti-terrorism: observations on form and process
Andrew Lynch, June 2017
Summary
The likely conduct of the three arms of government in responding to threats to national security – and the strengths and weaknesses possessed by each in doing so – has been the subject of a considerable amount of academic debate in the years since the terrorist attacks on the United States in 2001. Although the question of how democracies can defeat an enemy while still maintaining essential checks and balances on government is far from a new one, it has certainly received sustained attention, frequently enriched through use of comparative perspectives and experiences, in the first decade of this century.
Keywords
Terrorism Legislation Security
Preview
Metadata
Related publications
Enhance approaches to address the evolving nature of Violent Extremist Attacks …
According to the Centre for Human Rights and Policy Studies (CHRIPS) observatory report, the majority of attacks in …
Trends of Violent Extremist Attacks and Arrests in Kenya, January - December 20…
This report draws from the Terror Attacks and Arrests Observatory of the Centre for Human Rights and Policy …
Managing role expectations and emotions in encounters with extremism: Norwegian…
To prevent radicalisation and violent extremism, many European countries have adopted a multiagency approach, consisting of both police, …
The psychologisation of counterextremism: unpacking PREVENT
: The burgeoning ‘pre-crime’ industry reveals a deep overlap between national security and mental health. The UK’s counter-radicalisation …