Anti-terrorism laws: balancing national security and a fair hearing
Nicola McGarrity and Edward Santow, June 2017
Summary
Increasingly since 9/11, national security questions have arisen in civil litigation, in areas as diverse as immigration, family law and contractual disputes. This chapter considers the situation where security-sensitive information is withheld from a party or the public. h e denial of access to such information, in circumstances where it would ordinarily be available, can impact deleteriously on a party’s right to a fair hearing and the principle of open justice.
Keywords
Security Human Rights Counter-Terrorism
Preview
Metadata
Related publications
Enhance approaches to address the evolving nature of Violent Extremist Attacks …
According to the Centre for Human Rights and Policy Studies (CHRIPS) observatory report, the majority of attacks in …
Trends of Violent Extremist Attacks and Arrests in Kenya, January - December 20…
This report draws from the Terror Attacks and Arrests Observatory of the Centre for Human Rights and Policy …
The psychologisation of counterextremism: unpacking PREVENT
: The burgeoning ‘pre-crime’ industry reveals a deep overlap between national security and mental health. The UK’s counter-radicalisation …
Managing role expectations and emotions in encounters with extremism: Norwegian…
To prevent radicalisation and violent extremism, many European countries have adopted a multiagency approach, consisting of both police, …