Moving Target UK–GCC Relations and the Politics of ‘Extremism’
Jane Kinninmont, September 2016
Summary
Fifteen years after the United States declared a ‘war on terror’, the Western policy agenda has moved on to a broader focus on countering ‘extremism’. But just as ‘terrorism’ has long been an internationally contested notion, there is even less consensus on what defines extremism – and much less still on the increasingly central notion of ‘non-violent extremism’. In the current international political context, the debate concerning extremism has centred on violent Islamist extremism, exemplified by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) and Al-Qaeda (AQ), both recognized internationally as terrorist organizations.
Keywords
Extremism Policy Politics Terrorism
Preview
Metadata
Related publications
Prioritising the Rights and Well-being of Police Officers in Kenya
Policing in Kenya transcends mere employment; it's a profound calling characterised by danger and sacrifice. Officers endure disrupted …
RE-INTEGRATION OF EX-AL SHABAAB TERRORISTS INTO THE KENYAN SOCIETY: A CASE OF…
This study examines political factors, religious factors and social economic factors that have contributed a lot to the …
Assessing the Expeditiousness of Existing Strategies for Preventi…
Youth radicalization is a security problem in Kenya. Youth extremism has caused death, injury, psychological anguish, and increased …
PREVENTING YOUTH VIOLENT RADICALISATIONANDVIOLENT EXTREMISM IN KENYA: A PUBLIC …
Violent extremism and radicalization are multifaceted phenomena that advocates and promotes violence related with or justified by specific …