CVE Research Hub Knowledge Platform · Kenya
Education Article

Securitization, Counterterrorism and the Silencing of Dissent: The Educational Implications of Prevent

Aislinn O'Donnell, December 2015

Summary

This essay examines some of the implications of the Prevent legislation in the UK that has made it a statutory duty for a range of institutions and organizations, including educational institutions, to prevent terrorism. It also examines the implications of other elements of counterterrorism legislation for educators. Whilst many organizations had previously engaged with Prevent on a voluntary basis, this new legislation, setting duties on a statutory footing, has significant implications for curricula, freedom of speech, critical enquiry, the pedagogical relationship, the educational experience, and for the integrity of students, teachers and lecturers.

Keywords

Radicalization Counterterrorism Securitization Education

Preview

Metadata

Theme
Education
Type
Article
Format
Adobe PDF
Published
16 December 2015
Author
Aislinn O'Donnell
Access
Open access

Related publications

Healing-Centered Peacebuilding: An approach to preventing violent extremism

Community-based trauma healing practices are claiming their space in preventing and combating violent extremism (P/CVE), as well as …

Young People in the Fight Against Violent Extremism through Sport for Change (S…

Approaches to countering violent extremism have evolved significantly in recent years, especially as the violent extremist threat itself …

Rethinking the Climate Change and Conflict Linkage: Towards a Co-Evolutionary A…

the world is increasingly moving towards the brink of a climate crisis that serves as a major drawback …

Resilience Factors and Prevention of Radicalization and Violent Extremism in Mo…

Violent extremism and radicalization that lead to terrorism poses an existential threat to security, development, and well-being both …